Gay Marriage in Illinois

11:39 PM Posted In , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
breakingnews:
Illinois Senate committee approves gay marriage bill
Chicago Tribune: The Illinois Senate Executive Committee advanced the measure to legalize gay marriage on an 8-5 vote Thursday, but the sponsor acknowledged she did not have enough votes to win approval on the Senate floor.
Sen. Heather Steans, D-Chicago, dismissed a question on whether she ever had a solid 30 votes lined up to pass the legislation. “Oh, no, no, no,” Steans said. “We really did have the votes. We were just missing members today.”
Photo: Illinois state Rep. Greg Harris congratulates Sen. Heather Steans after advancement of a same-sex marriage bill through the Senate Executive Committee at the State Capitol in Springfield, Illinois. (E. Jason Wambsgans/Chicago Tribune)

What I don't want my tax money spent on.

4:58 PM Posted In , , , , , , , , , Edit This 0 Comments »

Cross your fingers, folks!

10:54 PM Posted In , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
The New Jersey Senate votes on marriage equality on Thursday, and Portugal does on Friday.

Good news on marriage equality!

1:28 PM Posted In , , Edit This 0 Comments »
"Legislation will come into force on 1 January 2010 which clarifies that same-sex marriages in California which occurred before Proposition 8 are to remain valid in the state."
Ok, that one is a minor victory considering Prop 8 was passed. But I was worried that they would invalidate after all the pressure.
"American couples are readying themselves for a midnight celebration at the State House in Concord, New Hampshire where gay marriage will become legal as 2010 begins."
W00t!

First Gay Marriage in Latin America!

11:21 PM Posted In , , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
"Two Argentine men were joined Monday in Latin America's first same-sex marriage, traveling to the southernmost tip of the Americas to find a welcoming spot to wed.
Gay rights activists Jose Maria Di Bello and Alex Freyre were married in Ushuaia, the capital of Argentina's Tierra del Fuego state, exchanging rings at an informal ceremony witnessed by state and federal officials.
"My knees didn't stop shaking," said the 41-year-old Di Bello. "We are the first gay couple in Latin America to marry."
...
Only seven countries in the world allow gay marriages: Canada, Spain, South Africa, Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands and Belgium. U.S. states that permit same-sex marriage are Iowa, Massachusetts, Vermont, Connecticut and New Hampshire."
And recently Mexico City. But my favourite part is this:
""The decision took me by surprise and I'm concerned," Bishop Juan Carlos, of the southern city Rio Gallegos, told the Argentine news agency DyN. He called the marriage "an attack against the survival of the human species.""
Pretty sure that as long as we have Octomom and the Duggars, the human race will survive. Maybe not in a form with which we can be happy, but certainly enough to satisfy Bishop Carlos.

I just love it when they make my arguments easy.

Belated congratulations to Mexico City

4:02 PM Posted In , , Edit This 0 Comments »
"Joining only seven countries and five U.S. states, Mexico City's legislative assembly voted overwhelmingly Monday to legalize gay marriage.

The vote changed the definition of marriage in the city's civil code from being between a man and a woman to the free uniting of two people. Assembly members also approved a resolution allowing married gay couples to legally adopt children."

Chron.com

Sadly enough, it took a 2-hour heated debate where the politicians "publicly questioned one another's sexual preferences and activities." Just because one supports marriage equality does not necessarily mean they they are automatically non-heteronormative, not to mention the fact that even appearing to be otherwise can often spell the end of a politician's career.

Sigh.* I know, I know, I shouldn't look a gift-horse in the mouth, but it still feels like a one step forward and another back situation.

Hilarity with traditional views of marriage

8:06 PM Posted In , , , , , , , Edit This 0 Comments »

Honey, May I have control over my own body?

2:32 PM Posted In , , , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
Just a quick hit...
"An Ohio lawmaker has re-introduced legislation that would include a father's rights in the abortion decision-making process. Under Roe v. Wade, fathers are left out of the equation when a woman considers whether or not to have an abortion that would end the life of their child....
Adams told the Daily Reporter newspaper that abortion centers would "need to get consent from the biological father" before the abortion can proceed and he called the measure a "father's right bill" to protect the interest of fathers who are given no say in the abortion process.
He also said the bill provides for criminal penalties for women seeking abortions who do not obtain consent properly.
Adams told the newspaper that, in cases when the mother does not know the identity of the father, the abortion would be prohibited.
"There needs to be responsibility for actions," Adams said. "As someone who is pro-life, this is also an attempt and a hope to keep the two people who have created that child together, and I suppose if you just go back to the simple beginning, there is merit to chastity, and to young men and women waiting until marriage." "
I love the "PC" title of the article, "Ohio Bill Would Include Father's Rights in Abortion Decision-Making Process." In other words, the father has final say over whether there's an abortion or not, but is not held to any responsibilities in raising the child, whereas the woman is.
And you're screwed if you're raped while passed out drunk because you can't get an abortion unless you know who your rapist is, with severe fines for producing a false father.
Then Adams even says that the whole point is just to create happy little families, when reality, studies, and psychologists all say that children do not create a happy marriage. And the statistics on divorce largely pertain to the baby boomers rather than us 20-30 something's. I only know of two instances in my generation where divorce occurred, whereas of our parents' generation my parents are the only ones I know of who have never divorced.
I am hopped up on energy drinks and ranting. Check out Strollerderby for a more comprehensive critique.

Americans are marrying "other species."

9:49 PM Posted In , , Edit This 0 Comments »

The look on the co-host's face is especially hilarious as she's trying to politely tell him, "Shut up, you idiot."

I also can't help but think he's one a Creationist and never learned what a species actually is, let alone the difference between species and ethnicity.

And my second thought is, "Inbreeding: Keeping Bloodlines Pure Since 3150 BCE."

Prop 8 Upheld

11:54 AM Posted In , , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
Gods, of all the times when I have a reason to get stinking drunk....

And in other news, I hate people.

Conservative Activists Argue Gay Marriage Threatens Religious Liberty

12:23 PM Posted In , , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
My reaction: say what? *Sigh.* Honestly people. If churches, especially the Catholic church, can refuse to marry anyone on the basis of religion, then they can certainly refuse to marry them on the basis of sexuality. Some churches (I'm drawing heavily on the Catholic church as an example because that's what I was raised in) will even refuse to perform a wedding ceremony if you will not raise your potential children in their religion.
And just as churches have the right to say, "Nope, doesn't hold with our religion" people have the right to say, "Then screw you, I'm going to go find a church that won't hate me for living the way I was meant to." It's downright childish for them to blame their lack of converts on this one issue. People will attend churches that are loving and welcoming, not hateful and spiteful.
If anything, they should be mad that they are exposing themselves by refusing to do so. They have only themselves to blame.

"Out-of-Wedlock" births

12:27 PM Posted In , , Edit This 0 Comments »
Yeah, as usual, I'm late to the party. But I didn't really care about this report very much at first. Sure, the whole thing is a little too 1950's-esque. Some people want to get their panties in a bunch over this, let 'em.
Then I got to thinking why that would be, ignoring the statistics regarding teenagers as that's a whole 'nother rant in and of itself. You've got lesbian women who can't marry, and often can't adopt. Then there's polyamorous folk who can't marry all of their partners, who might or might not have planned such an occurrence. There's a good chunk of our society to whom we are denying legal marital bliss, and then bitching that they're having babies anyway.
And, as the article mentions, good ole' Christian marriage is not a priority anymore. I didn't grow up dreaming of my ideal wedding, pretending to marry the neighbour-boy, and all that craziness. I just wanted to find someone with whom I could spend the rest of my life, the rest would fall into place as it came. Most of us are realizing that the happily-ever-after faerie tales are nothing but lies. We women especially are taught that our wedding day is supposed to be the happiest day of our lives, not that wedlock is actually hard work. Then again, such a reality check would be a detriment to the wedding industrial complex, and we can't have that!

Good news and bad news

11:23 AM Posted In , , , , , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
First, the bad:
"A 44-year-old man has died in what police described as an "execution-style" killing after being shot at his home in Eccleshill, Bradford.
Neville Corby died at the scene at Ashbourne Road on Monday morning while his 31-year-old partner is recovering in hospital from gunshot wounds to the chest."
And the good:
"Supreme Court struck down the state's ban on gay marriage, saying the provision violates the constitutional rights of gay and lesbian couples.
The unanimous ruling issued Friday would make Iowa the third state where gay marriage is legal."

Outrage of the Day Part II-Lesbian Mom Ordered Deported

12:42 PM Posted In , , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
"A Northern California family is expected to be torn apart on Friday when Shirley Tan is scheduled to be deported back to the Philippines, leaving behind her life partner and their 12 year old twin sons.
Tan and Jaylynn “Jay” Mercado were married in San Francisco in 2004. Their marriage was voided, but even if it still were in effect the federal Defense of Marriage Act prevents Mercado from sponsoring her partner of 23 years for immigration. Were the women a married opposite-sex couple, Tan could be legal.
“From the moment my sons were born we have never been apart. It’s tearing me apart to have to leave without them,” said Tan.
Legislation was re-introduced in Congress last month that would allow Americans in a same-sex relationship to sponsor their “permanent partners” for legal residency in the United States."
And right-wingers wonder why we liberals "hate" America. Newsflash for the nutjobs: it's still not the land of the free.

Outrage of the Day-Legalized Rape

9:53 AM Posted In , , , , , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
"Afghanistan's President, Hamid Karzai, has signed a law which "legalises" rape, women's groups and the United Nations warn. Critics claim the president helped rush the bill through parliament in a bid to appease Islamic fundamentalists ahead of elections in August.
In a massive blow for women's rights, the new Shia Family Law negates the need for sexual consent between married couples, tacitly approves child marriage and restricts a woman's right to leave the home, according to UN papers seen by The Independent.
"It is one of the worst bills passed by the parliament this century," fumed Shinkai Karokhail, a woman MP who campaigned against the legislation. "It is totally against women's rights. This law makes women more vulnerable."
The law regulates personal matters like marriage, divorce, inheritance and sexual relations among Afghanistan's minority Shia community.
"It's about votes," Ms Karokhail added. "Karzai is in a hurry to appease the Shia because the elections are on the way."
The provisions are reminiscent of the hardline Taliban regime, which banned women from leaving their homes without a male relative. But in a sign of Afghanistan's faltering steps towards gender equality, politicians who opposed it have been threatened."
As always, Shakespeare's Sister has many more eloquent responses to this than I as well as a link to contact the US State Department.

Ridiculous Anti-Equality Propaganda

10:15 AM Posted In , , , Edit This 0 Comments »

H/t to Reave.

And if you can't stomach all five and a half minutes of that, there's an analysis of it here.

I honestly can't get up in arms over this one, largely because I'm rather sick today. The logic behind it is full of holes. I could repeat the same rebuttals such as we don't want to tear apart marriages, in fact we could care less about anyone else's relationships. It's the right-wing Christians who are wanting to dictate people's personal lives. We just want to have the same rights as everyone else, and have families of our own. Teaching tolerance in schools is not the same as teaching children to be gay. It just gets old.

And if anyone is still clinging to the belief that any of this shit is true, then no amount of reasoning nor truth is going to convince them otherwise. They're just fucktards.

Wyoming anti-gay bill dies!

10:36 AM Posted In , , , Edit This 1 Comment »
"Legislation to amend the Wyoming constitution to ban same-sex marriage has been defeated in the state legislature.
The House voted 35-25 against it, despite massive lobbying by socially conservative groups. The vote ensures the measure will not appear on the ballot in 2010.
The proposed amendment would have defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman and would block the state recognizing same-sex marriages performed in other states or countries where they are legal."
35 to 25 is a pretty big margin.

Outrage of the Day- Wyoming Tries to Go Anti-Gay

12:13 PM Posted In , , , , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
"(Cheyenne, Wyoming) Legislation to amend the Wyoming constitution to ban same-sex marriage has passed a key legislative committee.
The House Judiciary Committee voted 5 to 4 to send the joint resolution to the full House for debate.
The proposed amendment would define marriage as a union between a man and a woman and would block the state recognizing same-sex marriages performed in other states or countries where they are legal.
The measure would need a two-thirds vote in each house of the legislature and then be signed by the governor in order to make it onto the ballot.
Most Democrats have said they would vote against the measure. The legislature’s winter session will last only two months and with a worsening economic picture for the state, some observers say they believe the amendment may not make it to a vote.
“At the end of the day, I can’t allow a discrimination clause to have a chance to get in
our state constitution,” said Rep. Joseph Barbuto (D).
A similar proposed amendment passed the Senate two years ago but died in the House.
Wyoming already has a law limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples but state Sen. Curt Meier (R), the amendment’s main sponsor, said the law is not sufficient.
The national conservative Focus on the Family Action recently began a telephone lobbying campaign in support of a gay-marriage ban.
The Colorado Springs, Colorado-based group has been targeting voters in what it sees as swing districts where it believes it can exert pressure on lawmakers."
Slight side note. Many churches are afraid that if same-sex marriage becomes legal, they will be charged with discrimination if they refuse to perform said marriages. Wrong. Many churches/denominations refuse to perform marriages for anyone who doesn't belong to their faith. For example, non-Catholics generally can't get married in a Catholic church (there may be a few exceptions, but they're rare and I haven't heard of any). If they can't be sued for discrimination, neither can you.
Good luck trying to find another logical, secular way of supporting your small-minded hatred.

Freedom to Marry Week

1:43 PM Posted In , Edit This 0 Comments »
"This year’s theme for Freedom to Marry Week, 7 Conversations in 7 Days, promotes the single most important action everyone can take towards achieving marriage equality nationwide—having conversations with friends, family, co-workers, neighbors, and anyone who will listen."
I honestly don't know who I would talk to, considering most everyone I know already supports it. Talking about it with co-workers would be inappropriate. And in talking with my family, that would "out" me in perhaps more ways than one.

Prop 8 Donors

12:20 PM Posted In , , , , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
Here's what I have to say, and this will likely be it on the matter from me:
-Anyone who donates money to a political cause should be made public. Not to persecute the individual, but to track the money going into politics and keep it honest.
-Anyone who donates money to said cause should assume that it will become public knowledge. Particularly if they do so on behalf of a business.
-It's sad that allegedly death threats and vandalism have occurred against the donors. But where's the evidence? Go to the police. It happens to our community all the time, and guess what? They are carried out against us. Don't like it when the tables are turned, huh?
-As for the whining about people boycotting your business, quit yer bitchin'. We have the right to vote with our dollars. You have no right to our hard-earned money and then turn around and use it in political campaigns against us.
In short, suck it up and deal.