National Religious Freedom Day

12:12 AM Posted In , , , , , , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
January 16 is National Religious Freedom Day, to commemorate the Statute for Religious Freedom.  Evidently, it was thought that this was necessary in addition to National Day of Prayer.  There is even a www.religiousfreedomday.com full of bald eagles, the star-spangled banner, and tips for making "schools a safe place for your children to express your family's religious faith."  Obviously for these evangelical Christians, "religious freedom" means "free to proselytize," but that is nothing new. 
                                     
President Obama's speech included "Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus, Sikhs and non-believers;" a rarity for a politician to acknowledge more than the monotheistic triad, let alone atheists.  Yay!  Progress!  "...in the year of our Lord..."  Crap, spoke too soon.  Oh well, baby steps.
Then the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty has to jump in and criticize such a warm and inclusive sentiment.  Their problem?  The Affordable Care Act, which will require employers' insurance to cover contraceptives and therefore potentially violate the employers' religious convictions.

Tactical Response CEO Threatens To 'Start Killing People' Over Possible Obama Gun Measure

6:19 PM Posted In , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
Some nutsos should not be allowed to have guns if their first response to faulty information is to threaten violence rather than educate themselves about the policies being explored. Gun control is only one of many options that are being looked at. It is not the ONLY thing, but it's also not completely off the table. Overreaction much?

June is...

4:50 PM Posted In , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month.

Still alive... Mostly.

5:14 PM Posted In , , Edit This 0 Comments »
This cold (possibly H1N1) is still kicking my butt, although I am getting better... slowly. Going to watch the State of the Union address here in about an hour. While I am on the wagon, here is a fun drinking game for those of you who do imbibe.

I have been in denial.

4:11 PM Posted In , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
My friends have been trying to convince me that America is actually a fascist country, which I have been denying. Until now.
Due to the recent decision that allows unlimited corporate "donations" to political campaigns, McDonald's claims that they are going to have the power to pick the next president with their "You Pick the President" promotion. While I have not been able to verify this via other news outlets, I am going to keep an eye out. Even if it's a joke, I would not at all be surprised.

The hypocrisy deepens.

12:55 PM Posted In , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
You might want to put on your hip waders, gentle readers. According to Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele Bush was right to wait before reacting to the shoe bomber, but unacceptable for Obama to wait a falsely alleged two weeks after the crotchbomber. Thinkprogress, as usual, does an excellent job of finding the falsehoods and proving them incorrect.

Newsflash: Republicans are hypocrites!

9:21 PM Posted In , , Edit This 0 Comments »

"Eight years ago, a terrorist bomber's attempt to blow up a trans-Atlantic airliner was thwarted by passengers and revealed gaping holes in airline security only months after the Sept. 11 attacks.

But President George W. Bush, then on vacation, made no public remarks for six days about the so-called shoe bomber, Richard Reid, and there were virtually no complaints from the media or Democrats that Bush's response was sluggish or inadequate.

That stands in sharp contrast to the Republicans' withering criticism of President Obama — and some in the media — for his reaction to the Christmas Day incident on a Detroit-bound Northwest Airlines flight.

Obama commented publicly on Monday and ordered a full investigation of the incident."

And then when they're called on it, they got nothing.

Obama was smart enough to know better... Bush wasn't.

Dijon Mustard... The Elitist Shibboleth

9:52 AM Posted In , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
"Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, and Mark Steyn criticized President Obama as an elitist because he ordered a burger with "spicy mustard" or "Dijon mustard.""
Hannity also accuses Obama of having watched too much tv as a kid. Um, Hannity? Pot and kettle, considering you referenced the freakin' 80's commercial. Judging one's condiment choices? Reaching for straws here, boys and girls. Besides, how "elitist" can a Kraft (which is an American company, by the way) product be?

Obama's Persian New Year Message

10:05 AM Posted In , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
"A video message from President Obama tells the people of Iran and their leaders that the U.S. wants to engage with their country and end decades of a strained relationship, but not unless Iranian officials stop making threats. The message with Farsi subtitles is timed to the festival of Nowruz, which means "new day." It marks the arrival of spring and is a major holiday in Iran."
I believe it's a very smart political move, especially as it was well received among younger Iranians who disapprove of the unyielding response of the Iranian government to the message. Especially as it was not a behind closed doors message, it was essentially broadcast to the nation as a whole.
Unfortunately I am wondering how long it is before the fundies take up the "he's a Mooslum!!1!"

Legalize it?

11:12 AM Posted In , Edit This 0 Comments »
A friend who had read a clip about the recent uproar over Obama and marijuana started going off about how they're going to legalize weed. I love friends like this because they keep me on my toes and make me do my research.
I don't know how many states other than Oregon allow marijuana for medical purposes. And this is not about whether or not it fills a valid medical need. What the Bush administration did was raid any and all medical marijuana growers and distributors with little to no suspicion at all.
What they are going to do is focus on "traffickers who falsely masqueraded as medical dispensaries and “use medical marijuana laws as a shield.”" Doesn't sound like too much of a difference to me, other than they won't use it as an excuse to do whatever they want just because they might or might not disagree with state medical marijuana laws. How on earth you go from that to "they're going to legalize it!" I don't know.
That having been said, I say screw enforcing marijuana laws. Now that's not saying, "Legalize it." I couldn't care less about that. I believe in tighter enforcement on harder drugs, such as meth (which is a big problem in this part of Oregon). Who cares about a college student with a dimebag? Care about the meth lab that will kill people before it explodes and kills people.

Shoe Cannons, Feminist Graffiti, and Teaching Teh GAY

1:33 PM Posted In , , , , , , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
Breaking the Silence: On Living Pro-Lifers' Choice for Women at Shakespeare's Sister. Excellent piece on adoption vs. abortion and the emotional consequences of both.
Seriously? The Laramie Project was good (I saw it live), and not a horrible influence. Heck, the first time I saw The Holy Grail was in an 8th grade class, granted she did fast-forward through the convent scene. Nuns doing the can-can at double fast-forward is a scene I'll never forget.

Faith Based Programs and Obama

2:37 PM Posted In , , , , Edit This 1 Comment »
"President Obama, continuing and broadening an initiative begun by former President Bush, has created a new White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships.Under Bush, the office had supported the federal government's investment of more than $2 billion a year in private, mostly faith-based charities providing social services.
Speaking at the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington today, Obama said the office will help all community organizations -- religious and secular alike -- work on everything from helping people facing home mortgage foreclosure to providing job-training for those in need of work. "The goal of this office will not be to favor one religious group over another -- or even religious groups over secular groups," Obama said before signing an executive order establishing the office and an advisory council. "It will simply be to work on behalf of those organizations that want to work on behalf of our communities, and to do so without blurring the line that our founders wisely drew between church and state."
The president also addressed the role of faith in his own life and the need to bridge the many beliefs of Americans, including those without a religious faith -- as Obama, a Christian, has acknowledged he was raised. Under Bush, who had campaigned for president in 2000 with a plea to "rally the armies of compassion," the Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives that he created early in office helped faith-based charities seek federal funding for the social services that they provide.
The office will have four priorities, the White House says:
* Making community groups an integral part of the nation's economic recovery and making poverty "a burden fewer have to bear when recovery is complete."
* Offering advice on supporting women and children, addressing teenage pregnancy and reducing the need for abortion.
* Supporting fathers "who stand by their families," helping young men find well-paying jobs and promoting "responsible fatherhood."
* Working with the National Security Council to foster interfaith dialogue with leaders and scholars around the world.
At the prayer breakfast, the president also addressed the role that faith plays in America."Too often, we have seen faith wielded as a tool to divide us from one another -- as an excuse for prejudice and intolerance," Obama said. "Wars have been waged. Innocents have been slaughtered. For centuries, entire religions have been persecuted, all in the name of perceived righteousness. There is no doubt that the very nature of faith means that some of our beliefs will never be the same," he said. "We read from different texts. We follow different edicts. We subscribe to different accounts of how we came to be here and where we're going next -- and some subscribe to no faith at all."But no matter what we choose to believe, let us remember that there is no religion whose central tenet is hate," he said. "There is no God who condones taking the life of an innocent human being. This much we know."
Faith, the president said, also demands that Americans "lift up those who have fallen on hard times. This is not only our call as people of faith, but our duty as citizens of America, and it will be the purpose of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships that I'm announcing later today. . . ."
This work is important," he said, "because whether it's a secular group advising families facing foreclosure or faith-based groups providing job-training to those who need work, few are closer to what's happening on our streets and in our neighborhoods than these organizations.""
I honestly don't know how I feel about this. On one hand, it's stated goals seem to force old-fashioned gender roles on people by encouraging and helping men to find jobs and help women with children. On the other hand, he is doing it in a way that is inclusive of all faiths and non-faiths. Heck, Bush couldn't even get his labels right, let alone recognize Wicca as a religion.
“I don’t think witchcraft is a religion. I would hope the military officials would take a second look at the decision they made.”

Obligatory Musings on the Inauguration

10:34 AM Posted In , , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
I was only able to listen through to the end of Biden's speech because I had to work. That was enough to make me tear up.
The prayer, unsurprisingly, annoyed me with its tendency to beat you over the head with Christianity. Then again, I am spoiled because I attend a Unitarian Univeralist church. Our prayers are much more general and are usually to the Divine, however we define it personally. As they said on NPR, Rick Warren was chosen as an appeasement to the religious right. You should already have guessed what I'm going to say. Why should anyone, let alone our very leader, have to go out of his way to make a minority happy? No, the religious nutjobs do not compose the greater portion of our nation.
Naturally, I was, and am, proud to have our first African American President. But I find the argument that this could only happen in the U.S. ridiculous. True, we are one of the few democratic countries. However, not all countries in the world are as prejudiced and racist as we are. How many other countries were founded by genocide? (Note that I said "founded by" not "currently or have ever practiced").
I do believe there will be a female president in my lifetime, only on the condition that she is white, happily married with children, moderately attractive, and Protestant. I do not, however, believe that there will be a non-Christian in the White House for at least another century, if we are still around by then.
As I have said before, I don't care what religion our leader is as long as it's a positive, life-affirming one. But the religious nutjobs and Republicans have convinced everyone that we need to have a Christian leader because we are a Christian Country (tm). And we certainly couldn't have a Muslim in office, even if it might have provided him a unique insight to help. They have even convinced people without a particular faith that Obama is a Muslim and we can't have a Muslim as President. I was talking to Bronn, who is a witch, about this very topic and he became very angry, saying that the Qur'an tells Muslims to kill anyone who is not of the faith.
Every religion has its good and bad parts. The Bible tells Christians to kill disobedient children, non-virgins who marry, women who have a flashy appearance, and just about anyone who does not conform. The same as parts of the Bible, the Qur'an tells Muslims to defend themselves, but not wholesale slaughter. Just like the infamous "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live," some Muslims have taken parts of their scripture out of context for their own purposes. And don't forget, we Pagans have had our human sacrifices, feeding Christians to the lions (although that was more for political purposes than anything else), and the like in our past.
Ultimately, it's what we take from our faiths and focus on and practice in our lives. Sure, some people can take the hate and violence from theirs, and just as many, if not the majority, choose to focus on the positive, life-affirming aspects.

Outrage of the Day- White Supremacy

9:50 AM Posted In , , Edit This 0 Comments »
"Barely three weeks since America elected its first black president, noose hangings, racist graffiti and death threats have struck dozens of towns across the country.
More than 200 such incidents - including cross burnings, assassination betting pools and effigies of President-elect Barack Obama - have been reported, according to law enforcement authorities and the Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors hate groups."
The Quaker Agitator has the rest of the article. And as QuakerDave says, don't stand for this. Zero tolerance for hatred and violence.

More NRA'ers panicking

1:39 PM Posted In , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
At least it's stimulating the economy?

The article has details and references as to why most of the "Get yer guns" hype is untrue. And while I'm not currently edumucated on the finer points of gun categories, my current belief is that hunting weapons should not be curtailed beyond registration and whatnot. Handguns and the like are purely for killing humans, and I personally believe they should be banned. That is not likely to change any time soon, but I am sure that someone will come along and try to dissuage me of this view.

Bush's last minute HHS regulations

12:22 PM Posted In , , , Edit This 1 Comment »
"A last-minute Bush administration plan to grant sweeping new protections to health care providers who oppose abortion and other procedures on religious or moral grounds has provoked a torrent of objections, including a strenuous protest from the government agency that enforces job discrimination laws.
The proposed rule would prohibit recipients of federal money from discriminating against doctors, nurses and other health care workers who refuse to perform or to assist in the performance of abortions or sterilization procedures because of their “religious beliefs or moral convictions.”
It would also prevent hospitals, clinics, doctors’ offices and drugstores from requiring employees with religious or moral objections to “assist in the performance of any part of a health service program or research activity” financed by the Department of Health and Human Services."
New York Times

Vanessa at Feministing has more details, and suggestions on how to take action.

Gun owners freaking out again.

2:20 PM Posted In , Edit This 3 Comments »
"The Obama transition team is requiring that all potential hires for high-ranking positions fill out a seven-page questionnaire with questions about the applicant’s financial history, affiliations, professional background, legal history, and domestic help. Question #59 deals with gun ownership.
This question has raised the ire of gun-rights groups and their allies, who are charging that Obama plans to revoke the second amendment and has a “distaste for firearm owners." "
They really have been panicking. And it would make sense that Obama's administration might want to avoid something like Cheney's little incident in someone's past. Considering he's the first African-American president, they're going to have to be extra tough on the type of people they have working for him. And it's not an unusual question. I have seen and answered similar ones when volunteering in courthouses or while applying for government employment.

Did I read that right?

2:04 PM Posted In , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
"E.J. Dionne...joined other Washington Insiders in arguing that the best way for Obama to find common ground on abortion is to capitulate to the demands of Religious Right anti-abortion activists.... In other words, the president should betray his pro-choice supporters and continue policies that are not based on science but on religious right ideology. He says, Obama should govern as the "cultural moderate he promised to be. He should not lose his chance to make cultural warfare a quaint relic of the past."
From the article "When Liberals Become the Religous Right" via Religious Right Watch.
Wait, so the best way to find a sort of compromise is to give in to the Religious Right? And just in case you're thinking that the ellipses is hiding the context that makes it make sense, you're wrong. It says, "He says Obama should reward his prolife supporters by not rescinding Bush era antiabortion executive orders and not pursue prochoice policies."
Ok, so not revoking Bush's policies might be finding a middle ground. But as for turning completely anti-abortion? No.
I wish all compromises worked that way. I can see it tonight on my date.
Me: "I want to see this movie."
Him: "But I've already seen it."
Me: "Honey, let's find a common ground."
Him: "All right, we'll go see it."
In The Right Wing Dictionary:
Common Ground = do whatever we say.

Am I the only one who finds this ridiculous?

4:40 PM Posted In , , Edit This 0 Comments »
"Handguns and rifles are flying off the shelves at Ted Sabate's gun shop in Kensington, Md.
And while it's not uncommon for gun sales to spike when the economy takes a downturn, Sabate says that's not what he's hearing from customers. According to Sabate, gun enthusiasts are stockpiling because they say they're afraid the incoming Democratic administration will impose new gun bans.
"People are afraid that if there's another ban imposed ... they won't be able to buy them at all," Sabate said. "So they want to get something now before they don't think that they can."
Sabate's shop is not alone. In gun shops across the country, federal background checks are up 9 percent nationally over the last year, suggesting gun sales are increasing as Inauguration Day nears.
"Y2K and 9/11 were real busy, but it pales in comparison to what we've had going on here in the last week," said one Colorado gun dealer. "I've been doing this type of business for about 10 years and I've not -- I've never seen anything like this before."
Though President-elect Barack Obama said repeatedly during the campaign that he supports Second Amendment rights, some gun buyers still are not convinced.
"There's always questions any time there's a new president whether you vote for him or against him. There's gonna be questions about somebody new coming into office, what they're gonna bring into office with him," gun owner Larry Starks said.
Vice president-elect Joe Biden, for instance, was a strong supporter of the assault-weapons ban, signed into law by President Clinton in 1994. Under the ban, domestic gun manufacturers were required to stop making semi-automatic assault weapons and ammunition clips holding more than 10 rounds (except for military or police use). The ban expired four years ago."
Perhaps they forgot about this? "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. "
It reminds me of that one South Park episode where they all go around saying, "They took yer jobs!" Only it's, "They'll take yer guns!"

Bush Again Attempts To Block Release Of Prisoner Abuse Photos

12:39 PM Posted In , , Edit This 0 Comments »
The Bush administration petitioned a full appeals court late Thursday to reconsider a decision ordering the Defense Department to release photographs showing detainee abuse by U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. In September, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ordered the government to release the photos as part of an American Civil Liberties Union lawsuit seeking information on the abuse of prisoners held in U.S. custody overseas.
"This petition is a transparent attempt to delay accountability for the widespread abuse of prisoners held in U.S. custody abroad by keeping the public in the dark," said Amrit Singh, staff attorney with the ACLU. "These photographs demonstrate that the abuse of prisoners held in U.S. custody abroad was not aberrational and not confined to Abu Ghraib, but the result of policies adopted by the highest-ranking officials in the administration. The immediate release of these photos is critical to bringing an end to the Bush administration's torture policies and for preventing prisoner abuse in the future."
Not surprised.