On Rudeness and Knitting in Public
12:11 PM Posted In crafting , education , health , knitting , mental health Edit This 0 Comments »
While at a recent local knit night (knight?), the
perennial topic of knitting in public came up, specifically in
lectures/classes. Nearly every knitter has come up against the
perception that knitting while in the presence of others is rude. We're
going to completely bypass the history of knitting, and how "women's crafts" are believed to be kept in the home.
Knitting's for pussies
People
who perceive crafting in public to be rude assume that everyone else
processes their experiences the same way that they do. For example, we
all know that everyone has a different learning style
(i.e. visual, audial, or tactile). Most people fall into the former
two categories, and when it comes to retaining complex material I have
to take written notes. Written, not typed, in order to properly engage
my visual tendencies. If the topic is less strenuous, then knitting
helps to occupy the visual and tactile parts of my brain while leaving
my auditory portion to focus on the speaker. For example, as I write
this, I am also listening to The History Channel on the TV. That is my
experience as a knitter, and how my mind works. Your mileage may vary.
If I am unable to occupy my brain on several levels, it wanders. If I had music playing instead of America Unearthed,
I would be distracted by every other thought that came through my head
or jumping up every few minutes to go do some chore that occurred to
me. (While I have never been diagnosed with adult ADD,
I am pretty certain that I have at least a mild case of it). Knitting
works in much the same way for me. As long as it's not too complex a
pattern, it occupies the part of my mind that wants to wander away from
the task at hand. When I first began knitting, some of my friends were
offended that I brought it to Dungeons and Dragons
night. They were convinced that I wouldn't be able to fully
participate and/or would distract the group. I made the DM a deal: if
my knitting became a problem, then I would stop. Until then, let's give
it a try. The first time I came without a project, since I had just
finished one, the group called a break and told me I was to get myself
to the nearest craft store and pick one up. Without my knitting, I was
fidgety, drew other players out of the game with side-conversations,
daydreamed, and generally unable to sit quietly and wait for my turn.
In other words, I was more distracting without my knitting than I was
with it.
Sums up most conversations with me
Most
of those who cast such judgment are typically not, themselves,
crafters. They find themselves distracted by the activity. How many of
us have been approached while knitting in public with questions such as
"Are you knitting?" "What are you making?" "How are you doing that?" (I
get this one a lot because of my tendency to knit socks two at a time on one circular)
and other variations that come from a consumerist society. Instead of
possessing the willpower to focus on the speaker/main activity, they
allow themselves to be distracted by the crafter. The resulting
frustration is then directed at the crafter, who was minding their own
business in the first place, rather than taking responsibility for their
themselves.
They forgot "No, I will not knit for you"
Now
that doesn't mean you should sit front and centre and knit, as that
might be distracting to the speaker/teacher/lecturer. As long as you
aren't likely to drop metal needles down a sloped floor or constantly
elbow your neighbours, there is absolutely no reason you should be
considered any ruder than the person who smacks their gum, plays video
games on their laptop, or texts the entire time. You know how your mind
works better than anyone else. If you will focus and learn better
while keeping your hands busy, then no one else has the right to keep
you from doing so. Unless you're in a courtroom. They tend to frown on
people bringing garrotes into courthouses.
0 comments:
Post a Comment