Blessed Ostara!

1:28 PM Posted In , , , , , , , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
My husband and I can't observe tonight due to our busy schedule, so we're celebrating tomorrow.  Until then I am cleaning the house in preparation.  Our feast will include these:









strawberry cream cheese cobbler
Strawberry Cream Cheese Cobbler


Herbes de Provence-Crusted Lamb Chops Recipe
Herbes de Provence-Crusted Lamb Chops

"Happy Mother's Day!" Um... No thank you?

1:26 AM Posted In , , , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
I find myself at a unique stage of my life in which most people assume I have children.  Being that I am 29, this is not an unusual presumption.  The oddity is, is that the person in question assumes that I want or will have children.  Since I work in a nursing home, I am surrounded by elderly residents and nosy female coworkers, so the following conversation (or variations thereof) occur on a regular basis.
Me: "Happy Mother's Day!"
Them: "You, too!"
Me: "Oh, thank you, but I don't qualify."
Them: "You don't have kids?" in surprise.  "Oh, you will someday," reassuringly as I shake my head.
Me: "I don't think it's in the cards for my partner and I, but that's ok."  At this point, if the person in question feels that children are necessary in order to be complete, they usually drop the subject because the ambiguous phrasing could indicate fertility issues.  (For all I know, with my health problems, this could very well be true).
For some reason, there's a part of me that just won't smile and nod.  Perhaps it's because I refuse to kowtow to public opinion that all women of childbearing age desire offspring, perhaps it's because I am opinionated, or maybe it's because I don't know when to shut my mouth.  It's part of my charm.
I don't feel a need to justify my decision, but rather I feel that others need to justify why they project the stereotype of the nuclear family onto others.  One would think that we have reached the point where women, whether single or partnered, need not defend their decision to live childfree.  Having been adopted, I am firmly of the belief that every child should not only be wanted, but also planned.  While I was certainly wanted, my biological mother could barely take care of herself, let alone a baby.  
I suffer from much the same illness that plagued her, meaning that caring for myself can be a struggle at times.  I recognize that having a tiny, helpless person dependent upon me would be negative for both my and its well-being.  Not to mention that my partner does not wish to begin procreating in his early 40's.
By simply stating that I do not have, nor intend to have, children I feel I am doing my best to politely subvert the cultural paradigm without baring my soul for the scrutiny of strangers.  Perhaps next time they will ask someone if they have kids, rather than how many or how old they are.  Perhaps that person will realize that in assuming someone has or desires children they might be opening a whole can of emotional worms for other person.
Then again, I might just jump straight to grandmother considering the way my youngest cockatiel is chasing my eldest across the keyboard in an attempt to court her.  Although, judging by how she's avoiding his advances, she may just follow in my footsteps yet.

To all those who decided to make the wisest decision for themselves as an individual and their hypothetical offspring, Happy non-Mother's Day!

Outrage of the Day- Special Ed Kids Tortured

10:35 AM Posted In , , , , , Edit This 0 Comments »

"A group of parents say their children with disabilities experienced waterboarding-like torture” and other forms of abuse at the hands of two teacher’s aides at a Montana middle school.

Now, the teacher’s aides, Julie Parish and Kristina Marie Kallies, face felony charges of assault on a minor and endangering the welfare of children in connection with the alleged abuse in a special education classroom.

Witnesses say that students were subjected to water torture and forced to eat their own vomit. Further, parents say they suspect students were also confined to closets.

Parents noticed that students came home with bruises, bite marks, burnt fingertips and missing hair.

The students, who have a variety of disabilities including autism, Down syndrome and cerebral palsy, were unable to speak up about the problems due to their disabilities."

First of all, I thought that we left this shit behind in the '50's. Secondly, having volunteered with Special Olympics I cannot conceive of the type of person it would take to commit such atrocities. upon innocent children. My partner said it best, "Instead of jail, they should not be permitted to live."

What I will teach my future spawn

2:32 PM Posted In , , Edit This 0 Comments »
With Columbus Day recently, I got to thinking about how I was raised, generally by the school in this regard, to blindly follow modern "holidays" without questioning their history.
For example, do we associate St. Patrick's Day with the killing and persecution of Irish Pagans? No, it's an excuse to wear green and drink.'

Do we remember Columbus was an idiot who couldn't navigate his way out of a paper bag and raped and pillaged the "Indians?" No, it's a day for stores to commercialize and us to be annoyed by banks and post offices closing.

Do we remember the Pilgrims coming here to America to escape religious persecution, yet turned out to be hypocrites via forced conversions/banishment and harassment of anyone who didn't hold their same beliefs. No, it's a day to simply be thankful, eat too much, and watch football like good, dumb, patriotic Americans.

This got me to thinking about what I would teach my own children. Do I want to celebrate our holidays, their less-than-pretty histories, and their rampant commercialism? No. And come to think of it, considering we're in the middle of most Thanksgivings religiously and secularly (Sukkot, Mabon, Canadian, etc.) why would I need to celebrate Thanksgiving? We have our own versions of it in three different Pagan holidays, more or less, which focus on family, responsibility, thanksgiving, and all sorts of good qualities that I would want to instill in my children more than simply eating a ton of food and watching football. Granted, I would probably still celebrate it with my parents because it's already factored into most workplaces as well as providing quality grandkid time. But I would say that it's a secular holiday and we celebrate that because my folks are not Pagan, and it wouldn't be fair to ask them to celebrate a holiday they don't believe in. As they got older, I would tell them the actual history of Columbus and the Pilgrims.

Naturally, Christmas would be right out, but would probably celebrate that as a secular holiday with my parents.

New Year's would be right out, as it only promotes tons of drinking and is only marked then because that's supposedly when Jesus was circumcised. As a Pagan family, why would we care? We already have our own New Year's on Samhain (Halloween), which teaches honouring our ancestors and preparing for the coming year.

No Easter, why when we have Imbolc which Easter blatantly plagiarized?

Martin Luther King Jr. Day, would definitely celebrate that and black history. Probably not Valentine's Day because, quite frankly, it's absolutely useless if not offensive.

In other words, I will teach my future children what is important, history, and good values.

Baby named Sarah McCain Palin

2:27 PM Posted In , , , Edit This 0 Comments »
A jerk who evidently doesn't respect his wife and the decision that they had made TOGETHER, snuck behind her back and named the newborn Sarah McCain Palin.

First off, shouldn't it be Sarah Palin McCain? Aside from the fact he obviously doesn't give a crap what his wife, the one who just carried for nine months and pushed a baby out of a rather small opening, thinks.

If any partner of mine went and named the kid something else entirely other than what we had agreed upon, the third member of our family would also end up in the hospital. Let alone something as unwieldy and awkward as that.

Idiocy here.

Manners and "Gendered" Behaviour in Children

2:26 PM Posted In , Edit This 0 Comments »
I will certainly not teach any boys of mine to open the door for females, and I will not teach any girls of mine to expect the door to be opened for them by males.

What I will teach them is to open the door for the elderly, the infirm, people you respect, those with their arms full, and, in general, anyone behind you.

This will be taught to ALL of my children.

"Gendered" colours and children

2:24 PM Posted In , Edit This 0 Comments »
Colours. Blue must automatically mean boy and girl obviously means pink! This worked out so well since I've hated pink since a very young age. /Sarcasm.

Any children that I raise will be dressed in vibrant colours and none of that pastel crap that's so hard to keep clean, anyway. If a son of mine wants to wear a pink tutu, no problem. If a girl of mine wants to wear a blue shirt with a truck on it and camouflage pants, go right ahead.

Disclaimer: this is assuming that I would not be going out of my way. In other words, no spoiling.

"Gendered" toys and children

2:21 PM Posted In , Edit This 0 Comments »
Sexism is alive and well. Don't believe me? Peruse the toy section of any store.

My children will not be given make-up kits. Why? Because they are beautiful as is. Soon enough society will be telling them they aren't pretty enough. That day will be staved off as long as possible.

Dress-up kits, particularly ones that encourage them to pretend to be doctors, teachers, astronauts, and other career-oriented fantasies are definitely ok. No high heels, however.
Pretty much any toy that is not educational, inspiring, positive, and/or encouraging to their overall well-being is completely out. Non-career oriented Barbies are out, Bratz are a oh hell no, BB guns are a most likely no at least until they're older, and nothing that primarily encourages violence towards others.

And no loud, obnoxious toys that require lots of batteries.

Yes, I will be one of those parents.